🗣️ Druckify

Rewrite a script so it sounds like a Peter Drucker lecture — calibrated on words of his transcribed talks, not a vibe.

Pure rule-based stylizer · no model, no API · nothing leaves your browser · output is a style demonstration, not his words — label it AI-assisted.

Examples:
Style dials
Drucker tics
“you know”, “and so”, “I think”, “in other words”…
Distinctive trigrams
“will have to”, “one doesn’t”, “in this country”, “let me say”…
Contractions
don’t, isn’t, it’s, that’s — he almost always contracts.
Max sentence length
Median Drucker sentence: 11 words.
Rhetorical questions
He asks ~10 questions per 100 sentences.

Over-used trigrams log-ratio vs baseline · counts: your text → druckified

See every change

Measured from transcribed lectures. Drucker speaks in short clauses, addresses you, asks questions, and opens sentences with And.

Most frequent trigrams in the lectures

Distinctiveness chart (Evan’s chart — trigram log-ratio against a general-English baseline)

This is what makes the phrasing his rather than merely frequent — the Druckify dials target this list first.

How it works

  1. Corpus mining — every number here comes from lecture transcripts (words, sentences, sentence length, “you” rate, question rate).
  2. Deterministic rewriting — contractions, plain-English substitutions, sentence splitting, sentence openers (And so, And then, Now, You see), discourse markers, and targeted trigram rules.
  3. Distinctiveness targeting — the over-used-trigram chart (log-ratio, Evan’s chart) is the priority list: will have to, one doesn’t, in this country, let me say, there is no, it isn’t, plus the don’t-family.
  4. The engine never adds facts. The only opt-in exception is extra rhetorical questions.
  5. Tone safety: profanity and insults are stripped from the input, so they can never appear in the output. If the text is hostile, only a language model can properly reframe it — use druckify-lm for that.

Honest limitations

Provenance & disclosure