Examples:
Over-used trigrams log-ratio vs baseline · counts: your text → druckified
See every change
Measured from transcribed lectures. Drucker speaks in short clauses, addresses you, asks questions, and opens sentences with And.
Most frequent trigrams in the lectures
Distinctiveness chart (Evan’s chart — trigram log-ratio against a general-English baseline)
This is what makes the phrasing his rather than merely frequent — the Druckify dials target this list first.
How it works
- Corpus mining — every number here comes from lecture transcripts (words, sentences, sentence length, “you” rate, question rate).
- Deterministic rewriting — contractions, plain-English substitutions, sentence splitting, sentence openers (And so, And then, Now, You see), discourse markers, and targeted trigram rules.
- Distinctiveness targeting — the over-used-trigram chart (log-ratio, Evan’s chart) is the priority list: will have to, one doesn’t, in this country, let me say, there is no, it isn’t, plus the don’t-family.
- The engine never adds facts. The only opt-in exception is extra rhetorical questions.
- Tone safety: profanity and insults are stripped from the input, so they can never appear in the output. If the text is hostile, only a language model can properly reframe it — use druckify-lm for that.
Honest limitations
- This is a style demonstration, not a simulation of the person; the output is not his writing.
- He spoke mid-century American English; forcing it onto modern jargon (KPI, roadmap, stakeholder) can read as pastiche — which is useful if you want the contrast.
- No language model is used: quality scales with how well your input tolerates spoken clauses.
Provenance & disclosure
- Rules derived from archive lecture transcripts (Claremont Colleges Digital Library collection), used as aggregate statistics.
- Over-used-trigram rankings: Evan’s chart (log-ratio against a general-English baseline).
- Generated text is AI-assisted pastiche; disclose it wherever the output is published.